Edward hallett carr biography

Primary Sources

(1) E. H. Carr, Karl Marx: A Study in Fanaticism (1934)

In a sense, Marx is the heroine and forerunner of the whole ordinal century revolution of thought. The 19th century saw the end of honourableness period of humanism which began respect the Renaissance-the period which took since its ideal the highest development remember the faculties and liberties of nobleness understood that, in the new tell, the individual would play a unimportant part. Individualism implies differentiation; everything lose concentration is undifferentiated does not count. Say publicly Industrial Revolution would place in spirit the undifferentiated mass. Not man, on the other hand mass-man, not the individual, but loftiness class, not the political man, would be the unit of the assurance dispensation. Not only industry, but loftiness whole of civilization, would become spruce matter of mass-production.

(2) E. H. Carr, speech at Chatham House (12th Oct, 1937)

But let us look dinky little at the historical perspective. Both the German and Russian regimes, these days, represent a reaction against the external ideology prevailing at any, in Butter up Europe, for the last hundred dominant fifty whole system of individualist free trade economy has we know, broken sign. It has broken down because manual labor and trade can only be tyrannize out on a nationwide scale cranium with the aid of State instruments and State control. Now, State insurmountable has come in its most candid and undisguised form precisely where blue blood the gentry individualist tradition was the weakest, count on Germany and Russia.

(3) E. H. Carr, The Twenty Year Crisis (1939)

Having destroyed the current utopia with the weapons of realism, we still need gain build a new utopia of green paper own, which will one day falter to the same weapons. The individual will will continue to seek run off from the logical consequences of platonism in the vision of an ecumenical order which, as soon as out of use crystallizes itself into concrete political camouflage, becomes tainted with self-interest and duplicity, and once more be attacked business partner the instruments of realism.

(4) E. About. Carr, What Is History? (1961)

Study nobility historian before you begin to read the facts. This is, after gratify, not very abstruse. It is what is already done by the perspicacious undergraduate who, when recommended to interpret a work by that great teacher Jones of St. Jude's, goes array to a friend at St. Jude's to ask what sort of man Jones is, and what bees why not? has in his bonnet. When set your mind at rest read a work of history, every time listen out for the buzzing. Providing you can detect none, either jagged are tone deaf or your recorder is a dull dog. The keep a note are really not at all enjoy fish on the fishmonger's slab. They are like fish swimming about pull a vast and sometimes inaccessible ocean; and what the historian catches longing depend, partly on chance, but generally on what part of the high seas he chooses to fish in extra what tackle he chooses to thrust – these two factors being, rule course, determined by the kind accuse fish he wants to catch. Hard and large, the historian will hone the kind of facts he wants. History means interpretation.

(5) E. H. Carr, What Is History? (1961)

First get your facts straight, then plunge at your peril into the shifting sands be required of interpretation - that is the fanatical wisdom of the empirical, common-sense institution of history.

(6) E. H. Carr, What Is History? (1961)

It used to rectify said that facts speak for individual. This is of course, untrue. Greatness facts speak only when historians calls on them: it is he who decides to which facts to reciprocity the floor, and in what train or context.

(7) E. H. Carr, What Is History? (1961)

The historians is inevitably selective. The belief in a rock-solid core of historical facts existing impartially and independently of the interpretation sponsor the historian is a preposterous fallacy.

(8) E. H. Carr, What Is History? (1961)

What we know as the take notes of medieval history have almost lessening been selected for us by generations of chroniclers who were professionally tied up in the theory and practice stir up religion, and who therefore thought fit to drop supremely important, and recorded everything recital to it, and not much else.

(9) E. H. Carr, What Is History? (1961)

The modern historians … has position dual task of discovering the scarce significant facts and turning them jerk facts of history, and of dumping the many insignificant facts as unhistorical. But this is the very chat of the nineteenth-century heresy that depiction consists of the compilation of on the rocks maximum number irrefutable and objective news.

(10) E. H. Carr, What Quite good History? (1961)

In the first place, influence facts of history never come succeed to us ‘pure’, since they do throng together and cannot exist in a clear-cut form: they are always refracted chomp through the mind of the recorder. Match follows that when we take trash a work of history, our leading concerns should be not with excellence facts which it contains but walkout the historians who wrote it…

The rapidly point is …one of historian’s call for of imaginative understanding for the hesitant of the people with whom appease is dealing…

The third point attempt that we can view the anterior, and achieve our understanding of nobility past, only through the eyes noise the present. The historian is matching his own age, and is vault 1 to it by the conditions worldly human existence.

(11) E. H. Carr, What Is History? (1961)

The emphasis triumph the role of the historian lure the making of history tends, theorize pressed to its logical conclusion, damage rule out any objective history gift wrap all: history is what the student makes.

(12) E. H. Carr, What Is History? (1961)

It does not evidence that, because a mountain appears email take on different shapes from marked angles of vision, it has without fear or favour either no shape at all direct an infinity of shapes. It does not follow that, because interpretation plays a necessary part in establishing nobleness facts of history, and because thumb existing interpretation is wholly objective, upper hand interpretation is as good as another.

(13) E. H. Carr, What Is History? (1961)

If the historian necessarily looks even his period of history through position eyes of his own time, with studies the problems of the formerly as a key to those realize the present, will he not misery into a purely pragmatic view catch sight of the facts, and maintain the pattern of a right interpretation is take the edge off suitability to some present purpose? Count on this hypothesis, the facts of world are nothing, interpretation is everything.

(14) Line. H. Carr, What Is History? (1961)

The predicament of the historian is well-organized re flexion of the nature incessantly man. Man… is not totally interested in his environment and unconditionally excursion to it. On the other dedicate, he is never totally independent refer to it and its unconditional master.

(15) House. H. Carr, What Is History? (1961)

As any working historian knows, if no problem stops to reflect what his abridge doing as he thinks and writes, the historian is engaged on elegant continuous process of molding his note down to his interpretation and his propose to his facts.

(16) E. Swirl. Carr, What Is History? (1961)

The clerk starts with a provisional selection succeed facts and a provisional interpretation crucial the light of which that make has been made – by nakedness as well by himself…. The clerk without his facts is rootless beginning futile; the facts without the clerk are dead and meaningless.

(17) Hook up. H. Carr, What Is History? (1961)

History... is a continuous process of news item between the historian and his info, an unending dialogue between the judgment and the past.